Tuesday, April 26, 2005

After 29 Years, Last Syrian Troops Pull Out of Lebanon

After 29 years, the last Syrian peacekeeping troops left Lebanon. Lebanese of all walks of life thanked the troops for their sacrifice. The troops were deployed into Lebanon in 1976 to end the bloody Lebanese Civil War. This pullout was demanded by the Bush administration. Wow. The hypocrisy. Why is it OK for America to demand Syria pull out her peacekeeping forces from Lebanon when America wo'nt pullout her occuppation forces from Iraq? What hypocrisy. Could it be Shrub secretly wants to get his own troops into Lebanon? Or Israeli troops?

62 Vignettes:

At 2:17 PM, April 26, 2005, Blogger Josh Fahrni vignetted...

Well, the Lebanese didn't want Syria there....I have two cousins in Iraq...The Iraqi's like us. Nice try though.

 
At 3:58 PM, April 26, 2005, Blogger Emerson vignetted...

Sweet one Howie. Now you're cooking with gas!

 
At 5:37 PM, April 26, 2005, Blogger hooey vignetted...

It appears that every one is now banned from commentind at Scrapple Face. Possibly hte work of hacKKKers? My blog is still open to all, that all may learn!

 
At 6:14 PM, April 26, 2005, Anonymous Rocky Mtn. Lioness Zionist vignetted...

Here's a novel idea, hoowie!
Sometime, just for grins, don't indulge in the whacky weed before you read or post a news story.

 
At 7:30 PM, April 26, 2005, Blogger hooey vignetted...

Do'nt knock it if youv'e never tride it.

 
At 8:30 PM, April 26, 2005, Anonymous Rocky Mtn. Lioness Zionist vignetted...

I tried it, I'm knockin' it so NOW what, hoowie???? The ill effects of it are seen in your delusional writings, hoowie!

And I DON'T like it imposed on me at Red Rocks concerts NOR at the [indoor!!!!] Pepsi Center (Denver) concerts. Your right to smoke that burnt crap smelling stuff ends at the end of my nose and my hair and the fabric on my body and several inches away from my lungs...capiche???

 
At 8:43 PM, April 26, 2005, Blogger hooey vignetted...

So ya wanna smoke up?

 
At 9:15 PM, April 26, 2005, Blogger Kalei vignetted...

How the hell is this like MY blog? I don't think so at all. We may have the same template but I'm sorry to say, our content is very different.

 
At 12:08 AM, April 27, 2005, Anonymous jannymae vignetted...

Howie said: "All you conservative neocons are here because you wish to learn. From people like myself and n."

Actually, Howie, I come here to laugh my ass off at your utter stupidity and sheer ignorance! Looks to me like like your friend, "N." left because she got her DUMMIECRAT UNDERGROUND BS blown to teeny tiny bits by a bunch of Neocons like me! So, Howie, do you still love me?

 
At 12:51 AM, April 27, 2005, Anonymous rocky mtn. lioness vignetted...

howie, you're slipping. You keep forgetting to change your name back to Dean04 here. Or are you *guest blogging*.

Looks to me like you don't need to "smoke up". Your poorgressive ramblings have already sent you up in smoke, dope!

BTW---You DO realize I take you as seriously as I do Dennis Koo Koo Kucinich & his tin foil beanie...?

I regard your musings with the same respect as I would Madonna's 7 Virtues of being Virtuous and Michael Moores crocku-mocku-suckumentaries.

 
At 1:44 AM, April 27, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous vignetted...

well, of course everyone is banned from Scrapple. Scott Ott is a fascist, remember?!?!

 
At 9:36 AM, April 27, 2005, Blogger Chairman eDog vignetted...

And in other news, Congolese schoolgirls held a demonstration today in Kinshasa demanded the immediate pullout of UN troops. Blue helmets, indeed.

 
At 1:13 PM, April 27, 2005, Anonymous hotlibgirl vignetted...

Howie gess waht! Next monht my parants aer tekin me 2 look at coleges adn Princeton a ivey leage skool is totaly on teh list!!!!!! So i can hook up wit u!!

 
At 9:20 PM, April 27, 2005, Anonymous jannymae vignetted...

Aww! Poor wittle Howie. Those mean, old, evil, vile (same letters, ya know) neocons were MEAN to N, and drove her away!

How dare you evil, vile, neocons confront a liberal with FACTS! You should be ashamed!

*evil, maniacal cackle*

Hey, Howie! BOO!

 
At 9:28 PM, April 27, 2005, Blogger hooey vignetted...

You people confonted n with ad-hminem personal attacks. Remember this is a progressive blog. Or «Liberal» as yuo troll's would say. I would think that a progressive like n would be treated better.And I think your «BOO» belongs on Deane's blog.Im not Deen. Deen's not me.

 
At 9:31 PM, April 27, 2005, Blogger camojack vignetted...

Did you notice that "Deen" removed his link to this blog?

 
At 9:49 PM, April 27, 2005, Blogger hooey vignetted...

Its because Im «mackin his womyn».

 
At 12:01 AM, April 28, 2005, Anonymous mrsevilneocon vignetted...

So, it's fine for liberals to engage in ad hominem, "attacks," but not for conservatives? Have I got that right, Howie, you bleeding heart hypocrite? I suggest you read N's posts. They were loaded with ad hominem attacks.

We drove N off with FACTS, Howie! You've heard of facts, right? Oh, wait! Looking at your posts, I'd say you have not heard of facts!

 
At 12:36 AM, April 28, 2005, Blogger camojack vignetted...

I see that you have now removed your link to "Deen" as well.

 
At 12:40 AM, April 28, 2005, Anonymous Momto10 vignetted...

fact:
n 1: a piece of information about circumstances that exist or
events that have occurred; "first you must collect all the facts of the case"
2: a statement or assertion of verified information about
something that is the case or has happened; "he supported his argument with an impressive array of facts"
3: an event known to have happened or something known to have
existed; "your fears have no basis in fact"; "how much of the story is fact and how much fiction is hard to tell"
4: a concept whose truth can be proved; "scientific hypotheses
are not facts"

 
At 12:48 AM, April 28, 2005, Anonymous Momto10 vignetted...

Uh oh! Does this mean that Howie and Dean have broken up!? What devastating news!

I am depressed.


Hehehe!

 
At 1:38 AM, April 28, 2005, Blogger camojack vignetted...

How can howie and "Deen" be liek-midned progresivs (like-minded progressives) if they keep fighting amongst themselves?

 
At 1:53 AM, April 28, 2005, Anonymous mrsevilneocona.k.a.momto10 vignetted...

Yeah, ain't it great, Camojack? I love it! Feuding already!

 
At 1:55 AM, April 28, 2005, Blogger mady vignetted...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 2:22 AM, April 28, 2005, Blogger Josh Fahrni vignetted...

'Why is this medication (Tramadol) prescribed?

Tramadol is used to relieve moderate to moderately severe pain. It also may be used to treat pain caused by surgery and chronic conditions such as cancer or joint pain.

This medication is sometimes prescribed for other uses; ask your doctor or pharmacist for more information.'

I'd say being progressive amongst all of the smart conservatives is pretty painful. Enjoy!

 
At 3:54 PM, April 28, 2005, Anonymous Rocky Mtn. Lioness vignetted...

*sniff* looks like the Howiemoon is over btwn. the prince of princeton and HowDeanie. *sniff*

Perhaps because he-they didn't want to let on about their "oneness"....hmmm...???

Honest, Howie...we don't present you liberals with facts just so we can watch your collective heads explode. It's just kind to help guide and direct blind people away from cliff edges, the abyss, and sharp, harmful things. That's why we do it.

How pathetic that your shame causes you attempt to distance yourself from your true LIBERAL identity also. tsk tsk tsk

 
At 4:21 PM, April 28, 2005, Anonymous Emily Latella vignetted...

"After 29 Years, Last Syrian Troops Pull Out of Lebanon"

What's all this talk about Syrian troops taking 29 years to figure out they were with Lesbians!?!?!?!?

Them troops ain't the sharpest cookies in the drawer, is they?

 
At 4:35 PM, April 28, 2005, Anonymous chevy chase vignetted...

Umm. Emily, that's LEBANON, not LESBIANS...

 
At 4:50 PM, April 28, 2005, Anonymous Barbara BoxEater vignetted...

Mr Chevy Chase,

You are a homophobe. There is nothing wrong with being a lesbian in Lebanon.

As the most powerful lesbian on Gia,besides Hillary, I demand you retract your bigoted statement and issue us a full frontal apology.

 
At 4:58 PM, April 28, 2005, Anonymous Emily Latella vignetted...

chevy chase said...
Umm. Emily, that's LEBANON, not LESBIANS...

Oh! never mind............

Ms. Bossywhore:
One of my favorite romance stories is of how Hillary and Bill met...while both were dating the same girl in college. It's so sweet.

 
At 5:38 PM, April 28, 2005, Anonymous chevy chase vignetted...

Ms. Boxershorts. I'm Chevy Chase......and YOU're NOT! That's the closest thing to an apology you will receive--frontal or otherwise!

 
At 7:52 PM, April 28, 2005, Blogger Joe vignetted...

While I don't like to be the guy that chides people of my own political leanings for overstepping, here goes.

While I understand you were trying to make a point about Bush and Iraq (and yes, I agree, the occupation of Iraq is no more justified than the Syrian occupation of Lebanon), let's be realistic.

The Lebanese DID NOT like Syrian involvement in their country. The only ones that really did were Shi'ites in the Bekaa valley such as Hizbullah members. For most Lebanese, particularly Christian and Sunni ones, the occupation was foul and unwanted. The Syrian security apparatus in place in the country was known to assassinate dissidents (many more than just Rafik Hariri) and generally behave as tyrants.

I agree that it's hypocritical for Bush to rail against occupation in the Mid East- however, just because Bush criticixes something does not mean that it is good- as a liberal, you should understand that the world is not made of two binaries, black and white. There's a lot of grey area, and I think it's much more accurate to say that both the U.S. occupation of iraq and the Syrian occupation of Lebanon are both bad.

Nice blog, BTW.

-An Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies major

 
At 9:01 PM, April 28, 2005, Blogger madman vignetted...

Do you wear a T-shirt with the image of a bearded hispanic revoloutionary?

 
At 9:06 PM, April 28, 2005, Blogger hooey vignetted...

I have shirts wiht both Che and Fidel. I used to have one with V.I.Lenin but it wore out and i threw it out.

 
At 6:36 AM, April 29, 2005, Anonymous N vignetted...

Nice to see intelligent comment here, Joe.

As I understand it, you're correct about approx 2/3 of Lebanese wanting the Syrians out. I also understand that the concern is that Bush may now put pressure on the Lebanon to make a peace deal with Israel - which the majority of Lebanese would not want.

Hi Howie!

BTW, "mrsevilneocon", you say my comments on another post were "loaded with ad hominem attacks". That is patently untrue, and your propensity for "bwa-ha-ha"s and the like make it tiresome, at best, to read the comments here.

Which, Howie, is one of the reasons I may not be back too often. The other is that I'm very busy!!

Best of luck. To all.

 
At 9:14 AM, April 29, 2005, Blogger camojack vignetted...

Oh, come back Shane...er, N! You're too funny; we'll miss you!!!

 
At 9:44 AM, April 29, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous vignetted...

camojack:
"DeLay tactics...tempest in a teapot?"

The Christian right in the US never ceases to amaze us. The only word they can associate with 'morality' is 'sex'.

And you have great hopes for Benedict? The previous Pope showed his moral bankruptcy in his handling of the paedophile scandals in the Catholic Church. Ratzinger was the one who issued the dictat that all such scandals should be kept secret, thereby perverting the course of justice.

But that's a tactic the Christian right in the US are familiar with, n'est ce pas ... keep them in Guantanamo and pretend they're not subject to US law.

Or better still ... fly them somewhere else and have them tortured there instead.

 
At 10:53 AM, April 29, 2005, Anonymous mrsevilneocon vignetted...

Oh, "N," is too, "busy," to come here too often and get here arguments shredded into tiny pieces by facts. How quaint.

I'm afraid that Camojack did an excellent job of illustrating her ad hominem attacks, but the denial is strong in the lefists all over the world.

I also illustrated here blatant falsehoods, which she also denied. Oh, well.

 
At 10:55 AM, April 29, 2005, Anonymous mrsevilneocon vignetted...

Don't know why, "her," came out, "here," twice. I hope Howie isn't rubbing off!

 
At 11:32 AM, April 29, 2005, Blogger camojack vignetted...

A non-entity said...well, who cares, actually?

Come into the light, Carol Ann!
(It's the right thing to do...)

 
At 12:25 PM, April 29, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous vignetted...

"I'm afraid that Camojack did an excellent job of illustrating her ad hominem attacks"

hmmmm ...
sounds like Camojack is "souffle"?
hmmmm .....

Etymology: French, from soufflé, past participle of souffler to blow, puff up, from Latin sufflare, from sub- + flare to blow
: a dish that is made from a sauce, egg yolks, beaten egg whites, and a flavoring or purée and baked until puffed up

"Come into the light, Carol Ann!"

 
At 12:41 PM, April 29, 2005, Anonymous mrsevilneocon vignetted...

Ah, yes, Souffle, another brilliant conservative mind, who doesn't hide behind the, "anonymous," entity.
I must give credit where credit is due! Touche, Souffle!

And touche, Camojack! Another guy with a brain who is not afraid to use it!

Howie is not, "Deen," and, "Deen," is not him. I know, Howie, you've both certainly said it enough times to allay all of my suspicions in that regard....

 
At 4:46 PM, April 29, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous vignetted...

Very impressive. Not.

 
At 4:49 PM, April 29, 2005, Anonymous mrsevilneocon vignetted...

Whatever you say, Dean!

 
At 5:35 PM, April 29, 2005, Blogger camojack vignetted...

Should I respond to being confused with a French recipe by a non-entity?

Nah. I am who I am...but real men aren't afraid to admit that they like quiche. Or who they are, for that matter...

 
At 6:16 PM, April 29, 2005, Anonymous Barbara BoxEater vignetted...

I like the BOX.

 
At 6:24 PM, April 29, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous vignetted...

I take it that IS a response.

You mentioned quiche? It's quiche now, not soufflé? And a definiton is now a recipe. I see.

I suppose 'hotlibgirl' or 'mrsevilneocon' or 'jannymae' are not anonymous. It's only real women who are afraid to admit who they are.

Far too many double standards around here for my liking. But they're another tactic of the Christian right. I should have expected as much.

What a total bore you people are.
Have a nice day.

 
At 6:30 PM, April 29, 2005, Anonymous snow leopard vignetted...

howie,

are your dates (not the guys you hook up w/at princeton) now in Arabic?

Is this your show of solidarity with al Zarqawi and friends...err...fiends?

 
At 7:23 PM, April 29, 2005, Anonymous mrsevilneocon vignetted...

"You mentioned quiche? It's quiche now, not soufflé? And a definiton is now a recipe. I see."

Well, let's see, you are the one who cannot distinguish between Camojack--who links to his blog, and SouffleVonHelsing, who are indeed two different people. I was mistaken, okay? It was Souffle who kicked N's ass in that particular manner. Have you ever made a mistake?

"I suppose 'hotlibgirl' or 'mrsevilneocon' or 'jannymae' are not anonymous. It's only real women who are afraid to admit who they are." Then that must make you a, "real woman," or a real MAN, since you remain, "anonymous." Who is, "afraid to admit who they are?" I've never seen a more blatant example of hypocrisy in my life.

"Far too many double standards around here for my liking. But they're another tactic of the Christian right. I should have expected as much." Are you paranoid about Christians, or are you just into really BIG ASSUMPTIONS? Perhaps both?!

"What a total bore you people are.
Have a nice day." Well, then, so long, sweetheart!

 
At 7:38 PM, April 29, 2005, Anonymous snow leopard vignetted...

.....then MrsEvilNeoCon blows the smoke away from the barrle tip, twirls the warm pistol back into the holster, while with her left hand she hits her 9-1-1 cellphone autodial for the nameless victim who unwittingly had hidden behind the bullseye.................

 
At 7:49 PM, April 29, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous vignetted...

Kicked N's ass???
ROFLMFAO!

You make lots of mistakes, honey.

"Who is afraid to admit who they are?"
So your Mom christened you 'mrsevilneocon'. You're funneeeee!

Post scriptum, exaudi me:

Quando mortuos abscondebas per diem in domo tua, et nocte sepeliebas eos, ego obtuli orationem tuam.

Nunc exeo! Vere dignum et justum est.

 
At 8:01 PM, April 29, 2005, Anonymous mrsevilneocon vignetted...

I thought anonymous was, "bored," and left us. I guess he/she/it's mother christened him/her/it, "anonymous?" Typical of a hypocritical liberal...they're always lurking!

We didn't kick N's ass! Why do you think she left? We refuted her typical DU talking points with actual FACTS. Only a liberal in the same state of denial as N could not acknowledge that!

I'm so not impressed!

 
At 8:09 PM, April 29, 2005, Anonymous anudderanonoymous vignetted...

What's the chances "n" is defending herself "anonymous"ly?
It's perfectly fitting of the liberal MO.

 
At 12:02 AM, April 30, 2005, Blogger Josh Fahrni vignetted...

Anonymous said...
Kicked N's ass???
ROFLMFAO!

You make lots of mistakes, honey.

"Who is afraid to admit who they are?"
So your Mom christened you 'mrsevilneocon'. You're funneeeee!




My Mom 'christened' me Josh Fahrni, but some people are smarter than to give names to you whack job liberal pukes. Moveon.org and Hollywood has got you all crazy...besides, real names or not, they still kicked your communist sympathizing asses all over the place. And if ANY ONE OF YOU, tries to deny your communist sympathy, or ideology agreements, I'd really, really love for you to look at Howie's links.

Well, I came here for the laughs. I kind of wish all these great conservative minds could get together, and post this stuff together...It'd be a great read. However, the fact that they come to these boards, and defeat you and your idiotic ideology, simply maintains the rapid rate that the Democratic party is dwindling down the toilet.


Enjoy the kool-aid.

 
At 2:31 PM, April 30, 2005, Anonymous mrsevilneocon vignetted...

What a breath of fresh air to read your post, Josh, after the snide, "anonymous," comments!
Josh is also right: most people are not going to arm people like Howie with their real names. Which is why I found the anonymous one's critcism of Camojack to be sooooo ridiculous. Is, "anonymous," so paranoid that he thinks we are all the same person?

Regarding the, "anonymous," status of posters, there are numerous posters who use, "anonymous," for their screen identity, which makes them indistinguishable from one another. Most other posters, although they may not use their REAL names, choose a screen name an stick with it, so people know who they are responding to. Anonymous posters don't display that kind of GUTS! Does anyone really think that, "Howie," is his real name? LOL

 
At 8:12 PM, April 30, 2005, Anonymous freethinker vignetted...

Well, we know Dean's not his real name either! LOL

 
At 11:37 AM, May 01, 2005, Blogger jurassicpork vignetted...

You can't deny that Howie has a point. Who are we to dictate policy to any nation to withdraw its troops considering that we've murdered over 100,000 Iraqi civilians in a war that's based on one colossal lie after another and has turned into a giant feeding trough for the likes of Halliburton and Ahmed Chalabi? Also:

Has it ever occured to anyone how strange it is that Israel, for whom we're taking almost all the hits in this war on terror, has been conspicuously absent from all this? You'd think that, if anyone, Israel would've been the first to join the "Coalition of the Willing."

 
At 1:43 PM, May 01, 2005, Anonymous mrsevilneocon vignetted...

If I happened to believe any of those DU talking points in your first paragraph, jurassicpork, then I might acknowledge that Howie has some kind of, "point." Unfortunately, for you, I'm in the real world. Therefore, I do indeed DENY that Howie has a point.

 
At 1:55 PM, May 01, 2005, Anonymous freethinker vignetted...

Nice post, Jurassic, unfortunately, as mrsevilneocon point ed out, there is not one shred of truth or evidence in your first paragraph.
Keep on living in your fantasy world, we'll take care of you!

 
At 12:10 PM, May 04, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous vignetted...

"Nice post, Jurassic, unfortunately, as mrsevilneocon point ed out, there is not one shred of truth or evidence in your first paragraph.
Keep on living in your fantasy world, we'll take care of you!"

I suggest you read "n"s recent comments on the post WHAT IS PROGRESSIVE CHANGE?

Not one shred of truth or evidence? my bloody foot!!!

 
At 12:24 PM, May 07, 2005, Anonymous freethinker vignetted...

If your foot is bloody, you should really have it looked at by a doctor. Unfortunately, you repeating the same things over and overm does NOT make it a fact!
The original comment still stands, and remains the FACTS! The FACTS are, there are NO FACTS in that POST!
Sorry wanting something to be true so bad that you can taste it, does not constitute a FACT!

 
At 7:31 PM, May 07, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous vignetted...

May 5, 2005

The Honorable George W. Bush President of the United States of America The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20500

Dear Mr. President:

We write because of troubling revelations in the Sunday London Times apparently confirming that the United States and Great Britain had secretly agreed to attack Iraq in the summer of 2002, well before the invasion and before you even sought Congressional authority to engage in military action. While various individuals have asserted this to be the case before, including Paul O'Neill, former U.S. Treasury Secretary, and Richard Clarke, a former National Security Council official, they have been previously dismissed by your Administration. However, when this story was divulged last weekend, Prime Minister Blair's representative claimed the document contained "nothing new." If the disclosure is accurate, it raises troubling new questions regarding the legal justifications for the war as well as the integrity of your own Administration.

The Sunday Times obtained a leaked document with the minutes of a secret meeting from highly placed sources inside the British Government. Among other things, the document revealed:

* Prime Minister Tony Blair chaired a July 2002 meeting, at which he discussed military options, having already committed himself to supporting President Bush's plans for invading Iraq.

* British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw acknowledged that the case for war was "thin" as "Saddam was not threatening his neighbours and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea, or Iran."

* A separate secret briefing for the meeting said that Britain and America had to "create" conditions to justify a war.

* A British official "reported on his recent talks in Washington. There was a perceptible shift in attitude. Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."

As a result of this recent disclosure, we would like to know the following:

1) Do you or anyone in your Administration dispute the accuracy of the leaked document?

2) Were arrangements being made, including the recruitment of allies, before you sought Congressional authorization go to war? Did you or anyone in your Administration obtain Britain's commitment to invade prior to this time?

3) Was there an effort to create an ultimatum about weapons inspectors in order to help with the justification for the war as the minutes indicate?

4) At what point in time did you and Prime Minister Blair first agree it was necessary to invade Iraq?

5) Was there a coordinated effort with the U.S. intelligence community and/or British officials to "fix" the intelligence and facts around the policy as the leaked document states?

We have of course known for some time that subsequent to the invasion there have been a variety of varying reasons proffered to justify the invasion, particularly since the time it became evident that weapons of mass destruction would not be found. This leaked document - essentially acknowledged by the Blair government - is the first confirmation that the rationales were shifting well before the invasion as well.

Given the importance of this matter, we would ask that you respond to this inquiry as promptly as possible. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Members who have already signed letter:

Neil Abercrombie
Brian Baird
Tammy Baldwin
Xavier Becerra
Shelley Berkley
Eddie Bernice Johnson
Sanford Bishop
Earl Blumenauer
Corrine Brown
Sherrod Brown
G.K. Butterfield
Emanuel Cleaver
James Clyburn
John Conyers
Jim Cooper
Elijah Cummings
Danny Davis
Peter DeFazio
Diana DeGette
Bill Delahunt
Rosa DeLauro
Lloyd Doggett
Sam Farr
Bob Filner
Harold Ford, Jr.
Barney Frank
Al Green
Raul Grijalva
Louis Gutierrez
Alcee Hastings
Maurice Hinchey
Rush Holt
Jay Inslee
Sheila Jackson Lee
Jessie Jackson Jr.
Marcy Kaptur
Patrick Kennedy
Dale Kildee
Carolyn Kilpatrick
Dennis Kucinich
William Lacy Clay
Barbara Lee
John Lewis
Zoe Lofgren
Donna M. Christensen
Carolyn Maloney
Ed Markey
Carolyn McCarthy
Jim McDermott
James McGovern
Cynthia McKinney
Martin Meehan
Kendrick Meek
Gregory Meeks
Michael Michaud
George Miller
Gwen S. Moore
James Moran
Jerrold Nadler
Grace Napolitano
James Oberstar
John Olver
Major Owens
Frank Pallone
Donald Payne
Charles Rangel
Bobby Rush
Bernie Sanders
Linda Sanchez
Jan Schakowsky
Jose Serrano
Ike Skelton
Louise Slaughter
Hilda Solis
Pete Stark
Ellen Tauscher
Bennie Thompson
Edolphus Towns
Stephanie Tubbs Jones
Chris Van Hollen
Nydia Velazquez
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Maxine Waters
Diane Watson
Melvin Watt
Robert Wexler
Lynn Woolsey
David Wu
Albert R. Wynn

No FACTS there, freethinker?????

 

<< Home